Showing posts with label ballot access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ballot access. Show all posts

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Empower District 1: Open Elections & People‑Powered Politics

 Has anyone else noticed? All around the world, countries are modernizing their cities—lifting citizens’ spirits and boosting future competitiveness. In Japan, innovative smart city projects like the experimental Woven City at Mount Fuji and Kashiwa-no-ha Smart City are integrating autonomous vehicles, AI, IoT, and 100% renewable energy to build safer, greener urban environments . China, meanwhile, is leading with over 500 smart city pilots, using big data and AI to improve public services in cities like Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou patentpc.com.

Contrast that with the U.S., which despite some progress—over 90 local smart city projects and a recent boost from federal infrastructure spending—still earns only a “C” grade for infrastructure, with billions needed to close the funding gap apnews.com+1patentpc.com+1.

Our competitors are setting the pace. China’s rapid deployment through centralized planning, and Japan’s Society 5.0 vision—blending physical and digital spaces—are propelling their citizens forward .

It’s time America caught up. We need bold federal investment in smart infrastructure, unified national standards, and consistent funding—not shifting every election cycle.

👉 Learn how Robert Beers plans to bring this vision to District 1 and beyond: www.robertbeers.com


Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Ballot Access & Public Campaign Financing for Fair Elections

 

Why It Should Be Easier to Run for Office

Across the U.S., ballot access laws vary wildly—some require thousands of dollars in filing fees (like SC’s ~$3,480 for House, ~$20,000 for Prez), or tens of thousands of signatures in tight timeframes brennancenter.org+2uhero.hawaii.edu+2newyorker.com+2fjc.gov+3ballotpedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3. These barriers effectively exclude everyday citizens and favor the wealthy or party insiders.

Proposed reforms:

  • Cap or eliminate filing fees for federal races.

  • Allow lower signature thresholds.

  • Give petitioners 90+ days to collect valid signatures.


💵 Public Campaign Financing & Small-Donor Matching

Heavy reliance on wealthy donors creates imbalance. Public match systems (like NYC’s 1:7 matching on small $10 gifts) empower grassroots campaigns fec.govtimesunion.comcampaignlegal.org+6brennancenter.org+6timesunion.com+6. Reviews (e.g., Brennan Center, Campaign Legal Center) show public funding restores accountability to voters, not donors ngpvan.com+15campaignlegal.org+15brennancenter.org+15.

Our plan:

  • Launch South Carolina pilot: small-donor matching (e.g., $50 → $300).

  • Offer optional public financing to limit big-money influence.

  • Set transparent spending caps.


✅ Gov‑funded General Election Runoffs

For the final two candidates in federal/state races, public funds would finance general election advertising, evenly split. This ensures:

  • Fair exposure without spending races.

  • Accountability to voters—not wealthy contributors.


✔️ Encouraging Broader Participation

These ballot and finance reforms would:

  • Lower cost of entry—welcome genuine citizen candidates.

  • Help non-rich individuals stay in races.

  • Promote diverse, community-focused ideas.